Supremecourt gay marriage
A decade after the Supreme Court’s Obergefell decision, marriage equality endures risky terrain
Milestones — especially in decades — usually call for celebration. The 10th anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case that made same-sex marriage legal nationwide, is alternative. There’s a sense of unease as state and federal lawmakers, as adequately as several judges, get steps that could take the issue back to the Supreme Court, which could undermine or overturn existing and future gay marriages and weaken additional anti-discrimination protections.
In its nearly quarter century of life, the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Rule has been on the front lines of LGBTQ rights. Its amicus short in the Obergefell case was instrumental, with Justice Anthony Kennedy citing information from the institute on the number of queer couples raising children as a deciding factor in the landmark decision.
“There were claims that allowing homosexual couples to marry would somehow devalue or diminish marriage for everyone, including different-sex couples,&r
Case Description
On November 14th, , two lgbtq+ couples filed writ petitions in the Supreme Court pursuing legal recognition of same-sex marriages in India. The petitions were centred around the constitutionality of the Special Marriage Act, (the Act). The first petition was filed by Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang. The second petition was by Parth Phiroze Merhotra and Uday Raj Anand.
The petitioners argue that Section 4(c) of the Act recognises marriage only between a ‘male’ and a ‘female’. This discriminates against same-sex couples by denying them matrimonial benefits such as adoption, surrogacy, employment and retirement benefits. The petitioners asked the Court to declare Section 4(c) of the Act unconstitutional. The plea has been tagged with a number of other petitions challenging other personal laws on similar grounds. The challenged enactments comprise the Hindu Marriage Act, and the Foreign Marriage Execute,
The petitioners disagree that the non-recognition of same-sex marriage violates the rights to equality, independence of expression and dignity. They relied on NALSA vs U Conservative legislators are increasingly speaking out against the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on same-sex marriage equality. Idaho legislators began the trend in January when the state House and Senate passed a resolution calling on the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision -- which the court cannot do unless presented with a case on the issue. Some Republican lawmakers in at least four other states like Michigan, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota contain followed suit with calls to the Supreme Court. In North Dakota, the resolution passed the articulate House with a vote of and is headed to the Senate. In South Dakota, the state’s House Judiciary Committee sent the proposal on the 41st Legislative Day –deferring the bill to the final day of a legislative session, when it will no longer be considered, and effectively killing the bill. In Montana and Michigan, the bills have yet to face legislative scrutiny. Resolutions have no legal power and are not binding commandment, but instead allow legislati At a convention for Southern Baptist church members in early June, delegates endorsed legislation calling for a ban on same-sex marriage and urged legislators to support them in this goal. Although same-sex marriage is currently protected in all 50 states due to the ruling in Obergefell vs. Hodges in , Justice Clarence Thomas has said he would favor to "reconsider" that judgment if a similar case were ever to before the court again. He also said he would be open to reconsidering Lawrence vs. Texas which legalized gay sex, and Griswold vs. Connecticut which legalized access to contraception, as these cases were built on similar case statute to Roe vs. Wade, which legalized the right to an abortion nationwide, was overturned in The Southern Baptist church is the U.S.' largest protestant denomination, and their endorsement of political causes has sway with GOP politicians, as they are a consistent Republican-voting base. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is one of the country's most powerful Southern Baptists. This call to eliminate homosexual marriage comes amid Some Republican lawmakers increase calls against gay marriage SCOTUS ruling
Why It Matters